Geithner dice que republicanos aceptarán mayores impuestos en EEUU












WASHINGTON (Reuters) – El principal negociador fiscal del presidente de Estados Unidos, Barack Obama, presionó el domingo a los republicanos para que ofrezcan ideas específicas para reducir el déficit, y predijo que aceptarán un alza de impuesto a los ricos para obtener un acuerdo antes de fin de año que evite la catástrofe económica.


El secretario del Tesoro de Estados Unidos, Timothy Geithner, dijo que depende de los republicanos si Estados Unidos cae en el “abismo fiscal”, una combinación de recortes automáticos al gasto y alzas generalizadas de impuestos que podrían lanzar al país a una recesión.












“Esa es una decisión que está en las manos de los republicanos que ahora se oponen al aumento de tasas tributarias” para los estadounidenses más ricos, un importante punto pendiente en las negociaciones para lograr un acuerdo de reducción del déficit, dijo Geithner a “Fox News Sunday”.


Los sondeos muestran que la mayoría de los estadounidenses está a favor de un alza de impuestos para los ricos y han comenzado a aparecer grietas en la que había sido una sólida oposición republicana a tal medida, por lo que el Gobierno de Obama estima que tiene la ventaja.


Pero el presidente de la Cámara de Representantes de Estados Unidos, el republicano John Boehner, se mantuvo firme y reiteró su postura contra el aumento de impuestos.


“Este es el problema”, dijo Boehner en una aparición separada en Fox. “Cuando subes las tasas, haces más difícil que nuestra economía crezca”, agregó.


Además, dijo Boehner, si los republicanos acceden a dar a Obama un total estimado de 1,6 billones de dólares en nuevos ingresos por impuestos, “El va a gastarlos”, no va a reducir el déficit.


Boehner también reiteró la oposición de su partido a que el Congreso otorgue al presidente la autoridad de aumentar el límite de deuda de Estados Unidos, un poder que tanto demócratas como republicanos valoran.


“El Congreso nunca va a renunciar a ese poder”, dijo Boehner, explicando que brinda a los legisladores el poder necesario para negociar con la Casa Blanca.


Con el público y los mercados financieros preocupados sobre el “abismo fiscal”, Boehner aprovechó su aparición en televisión para intentar aliviar los temores.


“No quiero ninguna parte de caer en el abismo. Voy a hacer todo lo posible para evitar eso”, dijo Boehner. Pero sostuvo que ambas partes siguen distanciadas cuando queda menos de un mes pasa negociar, agregando “no estamos en ninguna parte”.


Nuevamente se rehusó a entregar detalles específicos de sus propuestas de reducción del déficit, más que repetir que una opción sería terminar con varias deducciones tributarias no especificadas.


“El presidente ha visto varios opciones de nuestra parte. Hay muchas de ellas sobre la mesa y espero que la conversación continúe”, dijo Boehner.


Se esperan más negociaciones esta semana, al menos a nivel de personal. Pero ambas partes han dicho que podría necesitarse otra semana aproximadamente para que las negociaciones se pongan serias.


Un posible escenario es una solución de corto plazo que pospondría el plazo del abismo fiscal en seis meses a un año.


La oferta inicial de Geithner la semana pasada era elevar los ingresos tributarios en 1,6 billones de dólares y al menos 50.000 millones de dólares en nuevos gastos de estímulo económico, además de otorgar efectivamente al presidente la capacidad de aumentar el límite de deuda.


Los republicanos rápidamente rechazaron la propuesta como inaceptable, incluso risible.


“Quedé simplemente atónito”, dijo Boehner.


¿QUE GASTOS SE RECORTAN PRIMERO?


La demócrata de mayor rango de la Cámara de Representantes, Nancy Pelosi, reiteró su amenaza de obligar a una votación sobre un plan aprobado por el Senado para extender los beneficios tributarios a la clase media si Boehner no programa una inmediatamente.


“El reloj está avanzando y los puntos muertos son lujos que no nos podemos permitir”, dijo en un comunicado escrito después de que Boehner habló.


El senador republicano Lindsey Graham, en una aparición en el programa “Face the Nation” de CBS, repitió lo que muchos en su partido han predicho. “Vamos a caer en el abismo”.


Al igual que otros republicanos, Graham acusó al Gobierno de no negociar de buena fe al rehusarse a ofrecer recortes significativos al gasto.


El Gobierno insiste en que los republicanos ofrezcan sus recortes primeros, especialmente debido a que Obama ganó la reelección este mes prometiendo que elevaría los impuestos a los ricos.


“Es muy claro para mí que ellos han hecho un cálculo político”, dijo Graham.


“Esta oferta no lidia ni remotamente con la reforma a los programas sociales de manera de salvar a Medicare, Medicaid y la Seguridad Social de una inminente bancarrota”, sostuvo Graham.


En una serie de apariciones en televisión, Geithner insistió en que las tasas tributarias a los más ricos deben subir, y restó importancia a la conflictiva retórica de la semana pasada llamándola “teatro político”.


“La única cosa en el camino (de un acuerdo) sería una negativa de los republicanos a aceptar que las tasas deberán subir para los estadounidenses más ricos. Yo no los veo realmente haciendo eso”, dijo Geithner en “Meet the Press” de NBC.


Los comentarios corresponden a la más reciente ronda de maniobras que se concentran en la extensión de las exenciones tributarias temporales, creadas durante el gobierno del ex presidente George W. Bush, más allá de su vencimiento el 31 de diciembre.


Los republicanos quieren que los beneficios se prolonguen para todos los estadounidenses, mientras que el presidente Barack Obama y los demócratas quieren que las rebajas se apliquen sólo a quienes ganan menos de 250.000 dólares.


Los republicanos, que controlan la Cámara de representantes pero son minoría en el Senado, han expresado su voluntad de aumentar los ingresos mediante la adopción de medidas como limitar las deducciones tributarias, pero la mayoría se opone al aumento de tasas.


“No va a haber un acuerdo sin que las tasas suban”, dijo Geithner directamente en “State of the Union” de CNN.


El vencimiento previsto de los beneficios tributarios de la era de Bush y las reducciones automáticas al gasto del gobierno que deberían aplicarse a comienzos del próximo año restarían cerca de 600.000 millones de dólares de la economía.


(Reporte de Aruna Viswanatha y Thomas Ferraro; Reporte adicional de Anna Yukhananov; Editado en Español por Ricardo Figueroa)


Seniors/Aging News Headlines – Yahoo! News


Read More..

US budget talks ‘in stalemate’













US treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner has said there will be no deal to avert a “fiscal cliff” unless Republicans accept a tax hike for the wealthy.












But House Speaker John Boehner has dismissed a 10-year plan, which aims to raise $ 1.6tn (£1tn) through tax rises and spending cuts, as “silliness”.


The two men met on Thursday as time runs out to broker a deal.


Economists warn planned tax rises and spending cuts due to take effect on 1 January could trigger a recession.


Mr Geithner, negotiating for the White House, has drafted a plan that includes more spending to help for the unemployed and struggling homeowners, as well as cuts in Medicare and other benefits.


On Friday President Barack Obama warned of a “Scrooge Christmas” if soon-to-expire tax breaks for households earning below $ 250,000 were not renewed as part of the deal to avert the fiscal cliff.


But Mr Boehner, negotiating for the Republicans who control the House of Representatives, said talks with the administration had so far gone “almost nowhere”.


Talk show entrenchment


Mr Geithner and Mr Boehner’s appearances on a number of Sunday television talk shows showed how entrenched their positions were.


“There’s not going to be an agreement without rates going up. There’s not,” Mr Geithner told CNN’s State of the Union.


He called on Republicans to make a counter-offer to the Obama administration’s plan.


But Mr Boehner said he was “flabbergasted” by Mr Geithner’s proposals – which he said asked Congress to give up its power to set the nation’s debt limit.


Continue reading the main story
  • Under a deal reached last year by the White House and the Republicans, existing stimulus measures – mostly tax cuts – will expire on 1 January 2013

  • Cuts to defence, education and other spending will then automatically come into force – the “fiscal cliff” – unless Congress acts

  • The economy does not have the momentum to absorb the shock from going over the fiscal cliff without going into recession


“What do you think would happen if we gave the president $ 1.6tn of new money?” Mr Boehner asked Fox News Sunday. “He’d spend it.”


Mr Boehner says asking the top 2% of US taxpayers to pay more would deal a “crippling blow” to a fragile economy, and has criticised criticised the Obama administration’s proposed spending cuts as inadequate.


The White House has suggested it would not support any deal that did not increase tax rates on the wealthiest.


The fiscal cliff would suck about $ 600bn (£347bn) out of the economy.


The measures were partly put in place within a 2011 deal to curb the yawning US budget deficit.


BBC News – Business


Read More..

Egypt’s anti-Morsi rebellion of judges is complete












CAIRO (AP) — Egypt‘s rebellion of the judges against President Mohammed Morsi became complete on Sunday with the country’s highest court declaring an open-ended strike on the day it was supposed to rule on the legitimacy of two key assemblies controlled by allies of the Islamist leader.


The strike by the Supreme Constitutional Court and opposition plans to march on the presidential palace on Tuesday take the country’s latest political crisis to a level not seen in the nearly two years of turmoil since Hosni Mubarak‘s ouster in a popular uprising.












Judges from the country’s highest appeals court and its sister lower court were already on an indefinite strike, joining colleagues from other tribunals who suspended work last week to protest what they saw as Morsi‘s assault on the judiciary.


The last time Egypt had an all-out strike by the judiciary was in 1919, when judges joined an uprising against British colonial rule.


The standoff began when Morsi issued decrees on Nov. 22 giving him near-absolute powers that granted himself and the Islamist-dominated assembly drafting the new constitution immunity from the courts.


The constitutional panel then raced in a marathon session last week to vote on the charter’s 236 clauses without the participation of liberal and Christian members. The fast-track hearing pre-empted a decision from the Supreme Constitutional Court that was widely expected to dissolve the constituent assembly.


The judges on Sunday postponed their ruling on that case just before they went on strike.


Without a functioning justice system, Egypt will be plunged even deeper into turmoil. It has already seen a dramatic surge in crime after the uprising, while state authority is being challenged in many aspects of life and the courts are burdened by a massive backlog of cases.


“The country cannot function for long like this, something has to give,” said Negad Borai, a private law firm director and a rights activist. ‘We are in a country without courts of law and a president with all the powers in his hands. This is a clear-cut dictatorial climate,” he said.


Mohamed Abdel-Aziz, a rights lawyer, said the strike by the judges will impact everything from divorce and theft to financial disputes that, in some cases, could involve foreign investors.


“Ordinary citizens affected by the strike will become curious about the details of the current political crisis and could possibly make a choice to join the protests,” he said.


The Judges Club, a union with 9,500 members, said late Sunday that judges would not, as customary, oversee the national referendum Morsi called for Dec. 15 on the draft constitution hammered out and hurriedly voted on last week.


The absence of their oversight would raise more questions about the validity of the vote. If the draft is passed in the referendum, parliamentary elections are to follow two months later and they too may not have judicial supervision.


The judges say they will remain on strike until Morsi rescinds his decrees, which the Egyptian leader said were temporary and needed to protect the nation’s path to democratic rule.


For now, however, Morsi has to contend with the fury of the judiciary.


The constitutional court called Sunday “the Egyptian judiciary’s blackest day on record.”


It described the scene outside the Nile-side court complex, where thousands of Islamist demonstrators gathered since the early morning hours carrying banners denouncing the tribunal and some of its judges.


A statement by the court, which swore Morsi into office on June 30, said its judges approached the complex but turned back when they saw the protesters blocking entrances and climbing over its fences. They feared for their safety, it added.


“The judges of the Supreme Constitutional Court were left with no choice but to announce to the glorious people of Egypt that they cannot carry out their sacred mission in this charged atmosphere,” said the statement, which was carried by state news agency MENA.


Supporters of Morsi, who hails from the Islamic fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood, claim that the court’s judges remain loyal to Mubarak, who appointed them, and accuse them of trying to derail Egypt’s transition to democratic rule.


In addition to the high court’s expected ruling Sunday on the legitimacy of the constitution-drafting panel, it was also expected to rule on another body dominated by Morsi supporters, parliament’s upper chamber.


Though Morsi’s Nov. 22 decrees provide immunity to both bodies against the courts, a ruling that declares the two illegitimate would have vast symbolic significance, casting doubt on the standing of both.


The Brotherhood’s political arm, the Freedom and Justice party, sought to justify the action of its supporters outside the court as a peaceful protest. It reiterated its charge that some members of the judiciary were part and parcel of Mubarak’s autocratic policies.


“The wrong practices by a minority of judges and their preoccupation with politics … will not take away the respect people have for the judiciary,” it said.


Its explanation, however, failed to calm the anger felt by many activists and politicians.


President Morsi must take responsibility before the entire world for terrorizing the judiciary,” veteran rights campaigner and opposition leader Abdel-Halim Kandil wrote in his Twitter account about the events outside the constitutional court.


Liberal activist and former lawmaker Amr Hamzawy warned what is ahead may be worse.


“The president and his group (the Muslim Brotherhood) are leading Egypt into a period of darkness par excellence,” he said. “He made a dictatorial decision to hold a referendum on an illegal constitution that divides society, then a siege of the judiciary to terrorize it.”


Egypt has been rocked by several bouts of unrest, some violent, since Mubarak was forced to step down in the face of a popular uprising. But the current one is probably the worst.


Morsi’s decrees gave him powers that none of his four predecessors since the ouster of the monarchy 60 years ago ever had. Opposition leaders countered that he turned himself into a new “pharaoh” and a dictator even worse than his immediate predecessor Mubarak.


Then, following his order, the constituent assembly rushed a vote on the draft constitution in an all-night session.


The draft has a new article that seeks to define what the “principles” of Islamic law are by pointing to theological doctrines and their rules. Another new article states that Egypt’s most respected Islamic institution, Al-Azhar, must be consulted on any matters related to Shariah law, a measure critics fear could lead to oversight of legislation by clerics.


Rights groups have pointed out that virtually the only references to women relate to the home and family, that the new charter uses overly broad language with respect to the state protecting “ethics and morals” and fails to outlaw gender discrimination.


At times the process appeared slap-dash, with fixes to missing phrasing and even several entirely new articles proposed, written and voted on in the hours just before sunrise.


The decrees and the vote on the constitution draft galvanized the fractured, mostly secular opposition, with senior leaders setting aside differences and egos to form a united front in the face of Morsi, whose offer on Saturday for a national dialogue is yet to find takers.


The opposition brought out at least 200,000 protesters to Cairo’s Tahrir Square on Tuesday and a comparable number Friday to press demands that the decrees be rescinded. The Islamists responded Saturday with massive rallies in Cairo and across much of Egypt.


The opposition is raising the stakes with plans to march on Morsi’ palace on Tuesday, a move last seen on Feb. 11, 2011 when tens of thousands of protesters marched from Tahrir Square to Mubarak’s palace in the Heliopolis district to force him out. Mubarak stepped down that day, but Morsi is highly unlikely to follow suit on Tuesday.


Middle East News Headlines – Yahoo! News


Read More..

Sony’s radical PlayStation 4 controller concept: A motion-control device you can split in half












While Nintendo (NTDOY) has been busy innovating with unique controllers on the Wii and Wii U, Sony’s (SNE) DualShock controller for its PlayStation, PlayStation 2 and PlayStation 3 has remained virtually the same since 1997. A newly discovered patent reveals Sony might be planning on a radical overhaul of the DualShock for the PlayStation 4 that’s rumored to arrive next year. U.S. patent 20120302347A1 details a “hybrid separable motion controller” that resembles a DualShock controller with two PlayStation Move sensor balls attached to it. Much like how the Wii Remote and Nunchuk controller combo separated the left and right hand input, the Sony controller patent goes one step further by allowing the two halves to be split and combined at any time – all without reducing the amount of buttons available.


The patent also highlights the inclusion of a “connection sensor for determining whether the controller is in a connected configuration or a disconnected configuration.”












One of the PlayStation Move’s biggest disadvantages is that it’s a separate controller and not the default one. As a result, most developers either saw it as merely a Wii Remote clone or as a niche controller with a limited install base not worth programming special controls for. If Sony were to include proper 1:1 motion controls within the default PS4 controller without turning its back on the “core” controller, it could greatly appeal to casual and core gamers.


Such a controller can be considered a natural evolution of the current DualShock 3 controller that sports limited motion controls using its three-axis accelerometer and gyroscope.


Of course, the controller is only a patent that may never make it to market, so don’t get your hopes up if it doesn’t happen.


Get more from BGR.com: Follow us on Twitter, Facebook


Gaming News Headlines – Yahoo! News


Read More..

Show sheds light on Handel’s hidden “Messiah” helper












LONDON (Reuters) – Anyone dusting off their copy of George Frederic Handel‘s “Messiah” in the run-up to Christmas this year might spare a thought for the unsung hero of the piece.


Without Charles Jennens, experts argue that the 18th century oratorio would never have been created, robbing Western choral music of one of its greatest works.












Handel House Museum, located in the cozy London home where the German-born composer spent much of his life, is seeking to put the record straight about a man who, for many reasons, has been passed over by history.


“The Messiah would not have been written without him,” said the museum’s director Sarah Bardwell of Jennens, who lived from 1700 to 1773.


For landowner and patron of the arts Jennens, the words to the Messiah were an expression of deeply held Protestant beliefs, and he was determined that Handel, a composer he had long championed, set it to music.


The words, famously opening with “Comfort ye”, are not Jennens’ own but carefully selected verses from the Bible as well as a small number of psalms from the Book of Common Prayer.


“If you listen to the words it’s all to do with your relationship with God as in the individual, there’s none of the big theological questions,” Bardwell told Reuters.


“Everyone can relate to the Messiah, even beyond Christianity on some level,” she added. “I think that’s why Jennens is so instrumental.”


FRIEND AND BENEFACTOR


Jennens, whose family fortune came from iron, was a friend of Handel and a major backer, subscribing to his music and providing the texts for “Saul”, “Belshazzar”, “L’Allegro, il Penseroso ed il Moderato” and probably “Israel in Egypt”.


So important did Handel consider Jennens that he referred to “your oratorio Messiah” in a letter to the librettist and made a detour on his way home from its premiere in Dublin to visit Jennens and tell him of its success with audiences.


The exhibition, “The Man Behind Messiah”, includes Handel’s autographed score of Saul which Jennens also annotated, suggesting changes to the composer’s work including a different entry point for the words “impious wretch”.


Yet Jennens’ name never appeared on scores, helping to explain why his contribution is largely unknown. An intensely private man, Jennens had reasons for remaining anonymous.


As a “non-juror”, or someone who did not endorse the Hanoverian royal dynasty that succeeded the House of Stuart, he was effectively barred from holding positions of authority.


And when, late in life, he published groundbreaking single-volume editions of some of Shakespeare’s most famous plays, he was attacked by a rival, Shakespearean commentator George Steevens (Eds: correct), and, thus, once again overlooked.


“It’s another reason he becomes kind of cut out of history,” Bardwell explained. “It’s been a fascinating insight into how people can just be written out of history.”


Ironically, despite his fundamental role in the Messiah and some of Handel’s other great oratorios, Jennens was not the biggest fan of a work that took less than a month to compose.


“He just thought Handel maybe rushed it off too quickly,” said Bardwell. Ruth Smith, the curator of the exhibition, believes Handel had the manuscript for about 18 months before he started work on it.


“For it to be rattled off in three weeks, I think Jennens felt that maybe he hadn’t done himself justice.


“I don’t think he ever quite got over his opinion that it wasn’t as good as he had hoped it was going to be. I think that also doesn’t help his reputation. I’m not sure he ever quite recovered from that.”


The Man Behind Messiah runs until April 14, 2013.


(Reporting by Mike Collett-White)


Music News Headlines – Yahoo! News


Read More..

How Social and Emotional Learning Could Harm Our Kids












Editor’s note: The following is a critique of a social and emotional learning program called MindUP that I have covered in other blogs (see list below) and in a feature in Scientific American Mind (visit ” Schools Add Workouts for Attention, Grit and Emotional Control”). Please also read a response to this critique, posted separately, from MindUP‘s Rebecca Calos. I hope this debate provides food for thought about how to best encourage healthy social and emotional development in our children. By Tina Olesen“Self-regulation” is the latest buzz word in education, and the MindUP curriculum for schools, conceived by actor Goldie Hawn, capitalizes on it. MindUP is marketed to teachers as a means of helping children to develop self-regulation, which is another way of saying “self-control.” The program’s “core practice” involves teaching children focused breathing techniques while they also practice non-judgmental awareness of their thoughts, which is supposed to help them calm down and be less anxious. Hawn’s curriculum is also supposed to make children feel happier and more optimistic. This is all purported to help them to be better able to learn. The truth is that MindUP can interfere with a child’s innate self-regulator, the conscience, impeding his moral development and thus his ability to learn. Rather than help him develop self-control, it trains him to manipulate his mind and manipulate others to get pleasurable feelings for himself.The “core practice” taught in MindUP is akin to certain forms of Buddhist-style mindfulness meditation including Anapanasati and Samadhi. In MindUP, the teacher strikes a Zenergy chime, and students are generally asked to sit cross legged, palms up and eyes closed. They are to direct their attention to the sound of the chime and focus intently on their breathing. The chime can gradually evoke a conditioned response in the children, as similar tools do in Buddhist monks. Teachers are encouraged to use this core practice several times a day. Mindfulness meditation such as this can be a way of bringing the mind into an altered state of consciousness. Many people who practice meditation have encountered unexpected negative side effects such as a sensation of being disconnected from one’s body or from reality, among other frightening reactions. Teachers of MindUP are exposing children to these potential dangers.To teach a child to practice non-judgmental awareness is to risk interfering with the child’s ability to heed his sense of right and wrong. A child must make judgements to choose between right and wrong actions. When he acts in accordance with his sense of what is right, he grows in moral character, and develops greater self-control. While MindUP claims to be teaching non-judgmental awareness of thoughts and feelings, it actually teaches a child to judge any thought or feeling besides optimism and happiness as bad. It shows him how to escape the warnings of his conscience with pleasurable feelings–to make himself feel good even when he has done or experienced something that he ought to feel bad about. The program even encourages a child to do things for others with the motive of getting a pleasurable sensation, a dopamine high, for himself. Thus, rather than practicing self-control, children instead practice self-indulgence. They learn to escape from reality and difficult relationships, rather than working through them.The way to help the child develop real self-control is tried and true: a caring adult patiently and unflaggingly commits to the moral training of that child. Directing, warning, correcting and disciplining day by day, hour by hour, moment by moment, the adult encourages the child to do what is right, whether or not it feels good. When a child consistently chooses to act in accordance with what is right, he develops moral character. As he develops moral character, he becomes increasingly capable of governing himself and applying himself to his studies, and he develops the self-control required for learning. This can be a long and arduous process that requires self-sacrifice and much patience on the part of a parent or teacher. There are no short cuts. As Swiss philosopher Henri-Fr?d?ric Amiel once said, “The test of every religious, political or educational system is the man which it forms. If a system injures the intelligence it is bad. If it injures the character it is vicious. If it injures the conscience it is criminal.” As a society, we risk injury to our children’s consciences at our own peril.Tina Olesen is a school teacher on Vancouver Island in British Columbia, Canada. She examined the MindUP curriculum after hearing about it in her local school district. For more on MindUP, see:


  1. Goldie Hawn Plunges into Brain Science

  2. The Education of Character: Teaching Control with a Cotton Ball [Video]

  3. The Education of Character–Stoking Memory with Stones [Video]

  4. The Education of Character: Your Brain in a Coke Bottle [Video]

  5. The Education of Character: Jumping Jacks for the Mind [Video]

  6. The Education of Character: Carefully Considering Craisins [Video]












Follow Scientific American on Twitter @SciAm and @SciamBlogs.Visit ScientificAmerican.com for the latest in science, health and technology news.
© 2012 ScientificAmerican.com. All rights reserved.
Parenting/Kids News Headlines – Yahoo! News


Read More..

Can Spanx Stores Fit Into America’s Malls?













Katy Perry says she feels fat without them. Gwyneth Paltrow famously doubled up after the birth of her first child. So Spanx, the “problem-solving” underwear brand, is definitely riding the celebrity train. But can it take on Victoria’s Secret?


Spanx founder Sara Blakely, a protégée of Sir Richard Branson, is gambling that women’s growing openness about their bodies will propel the undergarment company beyond department stores into dedicated storefronts. The first Spanx store, a 1,200-square-foot boutique, opened earlier this month in upscale Tysons Corner in McLean, Va. Others are coming soon to King of Prussia, Pa., and Paramus, N.J.












The stores will carry all of the brand’s 200-plus items, an advantage over department stores, which have limited space. That will allow Blakely to display her line of activewear (yoga pants, shorts, skirts) as well as the better-known bras and shapers; not to mention the Footless Body-Shaping Pantyhose that made Oprah’s “Favorite Things” list in 2000. Also included: Manx, also known as man-Spanx.


The sale here isn’t sexiness. Rather it’s about looking healthy and fit—even for those who are neither—and self-affirmation. “Cheer squads” and “transformation teams” greet customers, and the entire space is devoted to form and function. Shoppers will not be distracted by items that would look good only on an angel.


“That’s what we want women to feel when they walk in and out of our doors—stronger, happier, and better about themselves and their potential,” says Spanx Chief Executive Laurie Ann Goldman in the company’s Craigslist help-wanted ad. A personal trainer probably says the same thing but charges more and inflicts more pain.


Allen Adamson, a global brand expert from Landor Associates, says the appeal to body image could work. “Quick fixes work in this space. Anything that promises you’ll look five pounds thinner without having to do the work.”


Adamson compares Blakely with Martha Stewart, saying a CEO remaining out front as the face of the brand is more powerful than any advertising tool. “Momentum is everything in retail,” Adamson adds. “She has an advantage over Victoria’s Secret because she is the brand.”


Blakely, a former standup comedian, likes to say she “became notorious for lifting up my pant leg to every woman walking by.” But if her latest and boldest venture succeeds, it will be thanks to old-fashioned tireless marketing.



Katherine Davis is an online producer for Businessweek.com.


Businessweek.com — Top News


Read More..

Egypt’s Mursi calls referendum as Islamists march












CAIRO (Reuters) – Egypt‘s President Mohamed Mursi called a December 15 referendum on a draft constitution on Saturday as at least 200,000 Islamists demonstrated in Cairo to back him after opposition fury over his newly expanded powers.


Speaking after receiving the final draft of the constitution from the Islamist-dominated assembly, Mursi urged a national dialogue as the country nears the end of the transition from Hosni Mubarak‘s rule.












“I renew my call for opening a serious national dialogue over the concerns of the nation, with all honesty and impartiality, to end the transitional period as soon as possible, in a way that guarantees the newly-born democracy,” Mursi said.


Mursi plunged Egypt into a new crisis last week when he gave himself extensive powers and put his decisions beyond judicial challenge, saying this was a temporary measure to speed Egypt’s democratic transition until the new constitution is in place.


His assertion of authority in a decree issued on November 22, a day after he won world praise for brokering a Gaza truce between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist Hamas movement, dismayed his opponents and widened divisions among Egypt’s 83 million people.


Two people have been killed and hundreds wounded in protests by disparate opposition forces drawn together and re-energized by a decree they see as a dictatorial power grab.


A demonstration in Cairo to back the president swelled through the afternoon, peaking in the early evening at least 200,000, said Reuters witnesses, basing their estimates on previous rallies in the capital. The authorities declined to give an estimate for the crowd size.


“The people want the implementation of God’s law,” chanted flag-waving demonstrators, many of them bussed in from the countryside, who choked streets leading to Cairo University, where Mursi’s Muslim Brotherhood had called the protest.


Tens of thousands of Egyptians had protested against Mursi on Friday. “The people want to bring down the regime,” they chanted in Cairo‘s Tahrir Square, echoing the trademark slogan of the revolts against Hosni Mubarak and Arab leaders elsewhere.


Rival demonstrators threw stones after dark in the northern city of Alexandria and a town in the Nile Delta. Similar clashes erupted again briefly in Alexandria on Saturday, state TV said.


“COMPLETE DEFEAT”


Mohamed Noshi, 23, a pharmacist from Mansoura, north of Cairo, said he had joined the rally in Cairo to support Mursi and his decree. “Those in Tahrir don’t represent everyone. Most people support Mursi and aren’t against the decree,” he said.


Mohamed Ibrahim, a hardline Salafi Islamist scholar and a member of the constituent assembly, said secular-minded Egyptians had been in a losing battle from the start.


“They will be sure of complete popular defeat today in a mass Egyptian protest that says ‘no to the conspiratorial minority, no to destructive directions and yes for stability and sharia (Islamic law)’,” he told Reuters.


Mursi has alienated many of the judges who must supervise the referendum. His decree nullified the ability of the courts, many of them staffed by Mubarak-era appointees, to strike down his measures, although says he respects judicial independence.


A source at the presidency said Mursi might rely on the minority of judges who support him to supervise the vote.


“Oh Mursi, go ahead and cleanse the judiciary, we are behind you,” shouted Islamist demonstrators in Cairo.


Mursi, once a senior Muslim Brotherhood figure, has put his liberal, leftist, Christian and other opponents in a bind. If they boycott the referendum, the constitution would pass anyway.


If they secured a “no” vote to defeat the draft, the president could retain the powers he has unilaterally assumed.


And Egypt’s quest to replace the basic law that underpinned Mubarak’s 30 years of army-backed one-man rule would also return to square one, creating more uncertainty in a nation in dire economic straits and seeking a $ 4.8 billion loan from the IMF.


“NO PLACE FOR DICTATORSHIP”


Mursi’s well-organized Muslim Brotherhood and its ultra-orthodox Salafi allies, however, are convinced they can win the referendum by mobilizing their own supporters and the millions of Egyptians weary of political turmoil and disruption.


“There is no place for dictatorship,” the president said on Thursday while the constituent assembly was still voting on a draft constitution which Islamists say enshrines Egypt’s new freedoms.


Human rights groups have voiced misgivings, especially about articles related to women’s rights and freedom of speech.


The text limits the president to two four-year terms, requires him to secure parliamentary approval for his choice of prime minister, and introduces a degree of civilian oversight over the military – though not enough for critics.


The draft constitution also contains vague, Islamist-flavored language that its opponents say could be used to whittle away human rights and stifle criticism.


For example, it forbids blasphemy and “insults to any person”, does not explicitly uphold women’s rights and demands respect for “religion, traditions and family values”.


The draft injects new Islamic references into Egypt’s system of government but retains the previous constitution’s reference to “the principles of sharia” as the main source of legislation.


“We fundamentally reject the referendum and constituent assembly because the assembly does not represent all sections of society,” said Sayed el-Erian, 43, a protester in Tahrir and member of a party set up by opposition figure Mohamed ElBaradei.


Several independent newspapers said they would not publish on Tuesday in protest. One of the papers also said three private satellite channels would halt broadcasts on Wednesday.


Egypt cannot hold a new parliamentary election until a new constitution is passed. The country has been without an elected legislature since the Supreme Constitutional Court ordered the dissolution of the Islamist-dominated lower house in June.


The court is due to meet on Sunday to discuss the legality of parliament’s upper house.


“We want stability. Every time, the constitutional court tears down institutions we elect,” said Yasser Taha, a 30-year-old demonstrator at the Islamist rally in Cairo.


(Additional reporting by Marwa Awad, Yasmine Saleh and Tom Perry; Editing by Myra MacDonald and Jason Webb)


World News Headlines – Yahoo! News


Read More..

Study: DVRs now in half of US pay-TV homes












NEW YORK (AP) — A new survey finds that digital video recorders are now in more than half of all U.S. homes that subscribe to cable or satellite TV services.


Leichtman Research Group‘s survey of 1,300 households found that 52 percent of the ones that have pay-TV service also have a DVR. That translates to about 45 percent of all households and is up from 13.5 percent of all households surveyed five years ago by another firm, Nielsen.












The first DVRs came out in 1999, from TiVo Inc. and ReplayTV. Later, they were built into cable set-top boxes. The latest trend is “whole-home” DVRs that can distribute recorded shows to several sets.


Even with the spread of DVRs, live TV rules. Nielsen found last year that DVRs accounted for 8 percent of TV watching.


Gadgets News Headlines – Yahoo! News


Read More..

No charges against Chris Brown in Fla. phone grab












MIAMI (AP) — Grammy-winning singer Chris Brown won’t be charged with a crime after a woman claimed he snatched her cell phone when she tried to take his photo outside a Miami Beach club.


A memo released Friday by the Miami-Dade County State Attorney‘s office concludes there is no evidence that Brown intended to steal the phone in February or that he deleted the photo. One or the other is necessary for him to be charged.












Prosecutors say that Brown tossed the phone from his limo and that it was picked up by security.


A felony charge against the 24-year-old might have triggered a violation of his probation for his 2009 assault on singer Rihanna, who was his girlfriend at the time. The two have recently collaborated on a new duet.


Entertainment News Headlines – Yahoo! News


Read More..